The ancient Coast Canal in Odisha’s Balasore district, once a symbol of hope for development for local fishermen and water management, is today embroiled in a scandal. There are charges that government money meant for the restoration and building of the canal has been misused on a massive scale. This extended report goes into the project background, the reported irregularities, and the wider implications of the scandal.

Background of the Coast Canal Project

The Balasore Coast Canal project was undertaken to provide a regular supply of water throughout the year and increase fish production by providing additional water storage capacity. The proposal, based on a request from the Fisheries Department of the Central Government, was proposed for the coastal folk of the Bhimpur belt in the Remuna constituency. A detailed survey was done on this proposal, and a grant of Rs. 7 crore 9 lakh 96 thousand 160 was awarded to fund the canal excavation work.

The scope of the project was vast: a canal 10 kilometers long was envisaged, of which the initial 3 kilometers would be 19 meters in width and the last 7 kilometers 16 meters in width. To aid this massive activity, a financial outlay of more than Rs. 8 crore 37 lakh was allotted. But what was conceived to be a revolutionizing infrastructure development project seems to have been pursued on questionable lines.

Alleged Irregularities and Malpractices

Several accusations have been made about the management of the project, relating to a scheme of corruption and embezzlement:

Mismanagement of Excavated Silt:
The project work involved the removal of silt, dug up by machinery, from the canal and relocated at a suitable disposal point. But it is alleged that rather than removing the silt, it is being dumped at the edge of the canal. This misconduct not only prevents the canal from widening but can also weaken the integrity of the entire project.

Damage to Original Embankments:
One of the more serious charges is that the original, strong embankment along the silt road is being intentionally cut through in the process of excavation. This would compromise the structural integrity of the canal embankment, posing threats to future collapses or water leakage. Critics contend that such destruction may be part of a scheme to subsequently justify extra funds for “restoration” works, essentially embezzling government funds on a regular basis.

Misuse of Excavated Soil:
The project guidelines dictate that soil dug out of the canal must be utilized to expand the nearby road. However, the soil is allegedly being returned to the canal, further jeopardizing the project’s original design. This mismanagement indicates an intentional attempt to sabotage the project’s objective.

Employment of Unqualified Labor:
Local citizens have expressed serious concerns regarding the quality of the workforce sent to the site of the project. There are allegations that the department engaged unqualified workers, including workers reportedly drunk on the job, to carry out the assignments. The lack of proper monitoring by the department engineer has only made matters worse, leading to substandard construction methods.

Lack of Transparency and Accountability:
The regulations for such projects require that an information board be erected at the site, specifying the project scope, budget, and progress. No such board has been erected. This absence of transparency only serves to heighten suspicions that the construction firm and some departmental officials may be determined to finish the job just for show, while skimming huge amounts of money.

Departmental Response and Ground Realities

As the allegations mounted, officials of the District Water and Sewerage Department have found themselves in the midst of controversy. The source of the ongoing problems with the handling of soil, according to Nrusingh Charan Patra, who is the SDO of the District Water Drainage Department, lies in using small machines not best suited to lift and transfer large amounts of soil. Yet, this technical rationale accomplishes little in addressing the larger issues of supposed financial mispractices and willful mismanagement.

The detention of the executive engineer of the Irrigation Department by vigilance officials further fueled the controversy. This has also raised suspicions about a concerted effort to divert funds from other water resource projects in the state. Since similar malpractices have been detected in other projects under the Water Resources Department, most suspect that this may be symptomatic of a systemic issue.

Local Consequences and Wider Implications

The implications of these charges go far beyond the direct financial setbacks. The Coast Canal was meant to be a vital infrastructure investment for Balasore, one that would ensure water supply sustainability and enhance local fish production. The demise of the project, brought about by misappropriation and mismanagement, is likely to have a disproportionate effect on fishermen livelihoods and the wider community that relies on this body of water.

Additionally, the scandal hangs like a shadow over government projects for regional development. With large amounts of money lost, there is growing distrust among local citizens and stakeholders towards future public works projects. The perceived corruption erodes public trust in the capability of government agencies to manage and implement large-scale infrastructure projects.

Calls for Investigation and Accountability

Against this background, there is increasing pressure for a proper and impartial investigation of the Coast Canal project. All stakeholders, including political leaders, civil society organizations, and ordinary citizens, are demanding accountability. They want those responsible to be named and prosecuted, and stricter measures to be put in place to avoid a repeat of the same in the future.

Recent visits by Central Water Commission officials and MP Pratap Chandra Sarangi have provided a ray of hope regarding the revival of the project. But unless there is a thorough investigation into the charges of embezzlement and mismanagement, it is still doubtful whether the project could be saved.

Conclusion

The controversy over the Coast Canal project in Balasore is an eye-opener to the issues involved with large-scale government projects in India. Though the project was meant to render huge dividends to the local populace in terms of better water supply and increased fish production, it seems that the project has been tainted with corruption and mismanagement. With crores of rupees in funds allegedly siphoned off, the credibility of the project—and public trust—hinges in the balance.

The path forward requires an unwavering inquiry into these charges, followed by firm action to bring the perpetrators to justice. Only then can the potential of the Coast Canal project be reinstated and comparable future projects be protected from corruption. For Balasore residents and the surrounding area, there is still hope that transparency, accountability, and good governance will ultimately win out, allowing public money to be spent for what it is meant to do and actually serve the community.

To read about more inspiring startup journeys, visit Arise Times.